Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Lisa Matviyenko vs Emily Welker Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Matviyenko vs Welker analysis and find out who is favored!
Lisa Matviyenko vs Emily Welker Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Matviyenko 0 - 0 Welker
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Matviyenko has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Welker has won 36.08%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Matviyenko, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Welker has won 57.54%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 44.99% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Matviyenko has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Welker has saved 44.96% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Matviyenko has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Welker winning 52.63% (W/L 20/ 18) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Matviyenko has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 62% (W/L 24/ 15), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 2). Welker has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 67% (W/L 8/ 4), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 50% (W/L 44/ 44).
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Matviyenko has played against opponents with an average rank of while Welker has played against players with an average rank of 202.47.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Matviyenko has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Welker has won 70% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Matviyenko has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Welker has converted 47.55% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
Ret.
Rank
420
High
26
Age
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
752
Rank
593
High
23
Age
Plays
W
L
W
W
L
L
W
L
L
L
Form
L
W
W
W
W
W
L
W
L
L
59% (189-133)
Career Total W/L
54% (117-99)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
50% (6-6)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
1
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Lisa Matviyenko vs Emily Welker For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Matviyenko VS Welker
Sportsbook
Offer
Matviyenko VS Welker H2h Matches played
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Lisa Matviyenko | Emily Welker |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (6/6) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 50% (14/14) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 49% (131/137) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/2) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 60% (6/4) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0.05 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 6 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0.24 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 32 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 2:9:20 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 186.25 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 71% (625/880) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 53% (333/625) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 36% (92/255) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 48% (68/143) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 49% (452/914) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (6/6) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 50% (6/12) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 75% (3/4) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 50% (2/4) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 80% (5/4) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 20% (5/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 29% (7/2) |
Lisa Matviyenko Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | 6-3 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 7-6(4) 6-1 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 5-7 7-5 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-4 7-5 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 4-6 7-6(2) 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-3 6-0 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-4 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-1 7-5 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 7-6(7) 5-7 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 7-5 7-5 | H2H | |||
view more
Emily Welker Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats 
Patricia Maria Tig
Player
Emily Welker
53%
(
29 of
55)
1st Serve %
45%
(
25 of
56)
-
Aces
-
6
Double Faults
6
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
16 of
25)
42%
(
11 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
9 of
31)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
40%
(
22 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
31 of
56)
64
Total Points Won
47
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Eva Maria Ionescu
Player
Emily Welker
69%
(
51 of
74)
1st Serve %
61%
(
34 of
56)
3
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
55%
(
28 of
51)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
43%
(
10 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
18%
(
4 of
22)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
49%
(
36 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
33 of
56)
71
Total Points Won
59
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Emily Welker
Player
Evelyne Atticia Tiron
72%
(
68 of
95)
1st Serve %
60%
(
52 of
87)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
10
53%
(
36 of
68)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
26 of
52)
41%
(
11 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
11 of
35)
53%
(
9 of
17)
Break Points Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
51%
(
48 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
50 of
87)
97
Total Points Won
85
|
4-6 7-6(3) 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Eva Maria Ionescu
Player
Emily Welker
71%
(
39 of
55)
1st Serve %
71%
(
42 of
59)
5
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
64%
(
25 of
39)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
19 of
42)
44%
(
7 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
42%
(
23 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
35 of
59)
67
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Emily Welker
Player
Eva Maria Ionescu
77%
(
36 of
47)
1st Serve %
63%
(
38 of
60)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
4
67%
(
24 of
36)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
36%
(
4 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
40%
(
19 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
34 of
60)
62
Total Points Won
45
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Emily Welker
Player
Nikol Rivkin
77%
(
72 of
94)
1st Serve %
75%
(
71 of
95)
0
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
51%
(
37 of
72)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
39 of
71)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
73%
(
8 of
11)
49%
(
46 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
44 of
95)
92
Total Points Won
97
|
2-6 6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Emily Welker
Player
Georgia Andreea Craciun
70%
(
47 of
67)
1st Serve %
55%
(
36 of
65)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
9
57%
(
27 of
47)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
40%
(
8 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
48%
(
32 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
35 of
65)
70
Total Points Won
62
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Emily Welker
Player
Bianca Elena Barbulescu
77%
(
68 of
88)
1st Serve %
57%
(
45 of
79)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
3
59%
(
40 of
68)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
21 of
45)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
44%
(
39 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
38 of
79)
87
Total Points Won
80
|
6-4 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Emily Welker
Player
Valerija Maija Kargina
67%
(
32 of
48)
1st Serve %
50%
(
32 of
64)
0
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
69%
(
22 of
32)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
12 of
32)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
38%
(
18 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
35 of
64)
65
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mayu Crossley
Player
Emily Welker
79%
(
92 of
116)
1st Serve %
85%
(
107 of
126)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
0
50%
(
46 of
92)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
51 of
107)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
42%
(
10 of
24)
Break Points Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
50%
(
58 of
116)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
68 of
126)
126
Total Points Won
116
|
5-7 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Matviyenko Vs Welker Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Matviyenko are available here and Welker photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
